Very Likely You Too Will!
April 6, 2020 12 Comments
Kicked myself seeing the solution!!!
Solution in Comments.
End
Source: Brain Teasers
Just another WordPress.com weblog
April 6, 2020 12 Comments
Kicked myself seeing the solution!!!
Solution in Comments.
End
Source: Brain Teasers
September 24, 2019 2 Comments
There are many memes on the subject – poor student sweating out in the examination hall.
These memes do get a fair share of responses when posted. It is interesting to look at these responses elicited by this one – they reveal the richness and diversity in thinking of the human mind – pls note, corporate honchos, if you think all the wisdom lies in one head. Of course most are flippant, hilarious, while a few seriously address the problem! Speculating on who in the world Jack is some go so far as to implicate poor Jill who knows nothing about the question on hand or even the beanstalk! Here is a very small sample across the spectrum:
###ברייטמן: Easy 34 stickers because he gave Dave 3
### Chaudhuri: Well according to nomenclature theory, Tani is a name given to women. But Jen gave the stickers to a man….and there is only one man present in this question, assuming that man is no one but Jack, Jack has 10 stickers……..😏
### Patra: Jack have 69 stickers…Prove me wrong 😂
### Kaur: 23 Stickers….becoz jack is the another name of Tani.
Suddenly the thought occured: What would I say?
Pause here for a moment and think about how would you answer.
Done? Here we go.
How about ‘Same as what Jack had before’? After all there are no transactions involving him. Simple, eh? Of course a dull/dry solution from who but an engineer trying hard to do better:-)
End
September 15, 2019 11 Comments
…spoiling the quiet of a peaceful Sunday morning.
**
Source: Arumi Oe Science Memes
**
Where is he going wrong?
Source: Dwiti Krushna Das Science Memes
**
Read in the ‘Comments’ if you wish to know how like I had to,
End
July 12, 2019 Leave a comment
Something interesting here, I thought, though not the kind to set Ganges on fire.
This is a picture taken by B, an ex-colleague. a friend, a nature lover, an ace shooter…with his camera, a cook who loves to experiment, a reviewer of eateries, etc. etc.
Location: Chembur.
To me, it is interesting to see this winged fellow picking twigs for the nest, all of uniform girth, neither too thick and stiff or too thin and breakable as if there exists some engineering specification!
End
June 15, 2019 1 Comment
(fm Brightside.com)
Monk.. …..I think the killer is #3, because
*
Donn.. ….I think it the one wearing red shirt. If you look closely enough the torn piece of his shirt is under victim. Other indicators are the victim was with the other girl. The open purse is the probably the victims. The waiter looks suspicious because he is bringing her the drink and she is gone. The girl hasn’t ordered yet Because she is waiting on her. The guy with red shirt is eating with both hands watching to see if their is any suspicions while covering up the fact he doesn’t have a knife. He is pretending to use one. Look closely to left hand. Their is nothing. He left his in the restroom.
*
Dave ….., BA applied mathematics
It appears that the murder weapon was left by the body, and it appears to be a knife.
#2 and #3 have their knives.
#1 is definitely a suspect, as we can’t see whether he still has his knife. Nor can we see whether he has blood on his clothes.
The other suspect is #4. His right hand appears to be holding a fork, as most activities with a knife require both hands, one to steady the food while the other cuts or spreads. His left hand is grasping something which could be food, but doesn’t look like a knife. He appears not to have a knife. Also, his shirt is the colour of the blood.
It might have been suicide. She doesn’t have a number, but maybe the numbers are there to mislead us. The question doesn’t mention the numbers.
Therefore it could also be the server. He doesn’t have a knife.
The door is ajar. Maybe the killer has already fled.
Wait, I’ve got it! #4 is probably eating meat. That makes him an indirect killer of an animal. But, in a sense, aren’t they all then the killer?
Back to #3: The server looks surprised to see her. Maybe she has taken the victim’s seat. Maybe that’s the victim’s purse on the table. And… her knife! Maybe the garment she’s wearing was an outer garment taken from the victim. Maybe #3 isn’t even a woman.
Nope. I need more information.
*
Neil ……..Could be #1 as you can’t see his table to establish whether he has a knife.
#2 and #3 clearly have knives on the table. Although it would be quite easy to grab a knife from another table.
#4 appears to be using chopsticks? He’s also in the line of sight of #2 which would be careless of he killer.
Most plausable options are the waiter as he could walk around the restaurant unnoticed. He could easily get into the ladies toilet without the patrons noticing.
however. It Is my belief that the killer or victim was sat in the chair on the vacant table, top left of the picture. The chair is slightly pulled out, which suggests its recently been vacated. (Every other chair is nearly pushed in) Also – note the ajar door top right of the image – someone has just left.
I believe the attacker was known to the victim. Stabbing like this is a passionate crime. (Probably a cheating husband involved) and lack of defensive wounds suggests the attacker could get close to the victim.
TL:DR – the killer left the restaurant through the open door and isn’t on site. (Who stays behind to finish their pasta salad after killing someone?!)
source: I watch tv.
*
Finally Adam ………
So it was!
As much as solving the puzzle, it was fun to follow the loud thinking!
End
June 14, 2019 Leave a comment
Continued from here.
Here’re some more responses selected for their own way of looking at it – it’s amazing, often hilarious, to see how human mind reasons out:
(sic)
Fran… I’m gona say the red guy, his shirts messy, he has a fork and no knife, the chef guy looks towards him with a confused look as to say where is your partner as he brings a drink and it looks like a second plate of dinner
Avne… A lady is thi kill because their are 2 knife on the each table but on the women table their is only one knife one kinfe is in the washroom
Shon. I think the lady is the killer as that washroom can be use ladies only a male cannot enter their
Dani……. Those rule Don’t apply to murderer
Kai…. dani…….,, it would be pretty obvious if a man entered the woman washroom
Jasm… the waiter. he murdered and now he is in a rush to get orders to catch up.
*
Now comes the most elaborate solution!!! Note his background – he’s not a movie script-writer!
Chas. …. Mathematician, Physicist, CS engineer, Inventor
‘* as I see it there are 2 possible solutions:the most likely scenario is the murder is no longer in the restaurant. the riddle never specifically states that the people with numbers are the only suspects. it is likely meant to distract and confuse.
notice the table at the top left corner of the room. one chair is slightly pulled out as if someone got up and left. this is either the victims seat, or it was where the murderer was sitting before leaving. im in favor if the latter for the following reasons:
• the door is left cracked open. this, alongside the chair, suggests someone got up and rushed out.
• excluding the unset tables, the top left table is the only one without a drink. notice how the waiter is holding a cup, looking confused, just standing in the middle of the room unsure what to do (likely because the person who ordered the drink is no longer there)
• nobody with even half a brain is going to stick around a crime scene where the just murdered somebody. seriously who brutally butcher’s a woman with a knife through the heart a public bathroom of a public place, then sits back sown to resume their meal? unlikely.
• now let’s consider #4. I believe he is most likely a red herring. the “obvious” killer, the only one without a knife that we can see. however if you look closely he has no fork either; he is eating with chopsticks. if he did have a knife the table, I believe the unlisted killer took it off his table as he passed by to enter the ladies room (which just happens to be right next to the bathroom, and therefore easily accessible)
• next we have #3. the woman does look nervous, and is a woman and therefore would have access. to me that’s just a little too obvious. one more thing to throw you off the scent. it is more likely she is scared because she went to the bathroom while waiting for her food, and saw the body and didn’t know what to do. as a Muslim she would have a higher tendency to refrain from reporting what she saw for several reasons ( she is the first suspect that would be considered by police, and also may fear being unfairly accused due to racial stigmas regarding Islamic immigrants. she may also be in the US illegally, and is too scared to reveal the crime.)
• finally let’s consider number 1. he looks sketchy af; we can’t see whether he has a knife still or if there are any blood stains on him. however he is sitting right by the exit, carefully watching it. #1 is an unknown, but i don’t think he’s the killer. possibly an accomplice though.
I believe the murder went down like this:
T= 0:00 > 0:03
■ the murder walks in. sits down at the top left table. the victim is already present. the killer possibly waited outside until the woman went to the bathroom, at which point #1 informs the murder it’s time; but the whole accomplice theory is just another possible addition.
note: it is by no means required the killer have any accomplice, and #1 could be completely uninvolved.—
T= 0:03 > 0:05
■ the waiter comes by and the killer either orders a drink (if the victim was already heading for the bathroom at the time) or asks for some time to look at the menu before ordering anything at all (waiting for his moment to strike). after doing either scenario, he/she either just walks directly to the bathroom, asks to be excused, or waits until the waiter leaves and heads to the kitchen to opens the man’s/woman’s ticket. then proceeds to fill their drink.
T=0:04 > 0:07
■ while the waiter is in the kitchen the killer makes it to the ladies room. it’s possible he grabbed 4s knife as he passed by (only if 4 had a knife to begin with, if not then ignore this- he is using chopsticks after all)
the woman likely knew the killer, as the crime was enough of a surprise to the victim that she didn’t call for help. Only the scared woman #3 seems to have noticed. it was a quick, quiet, and unsuspected kill. probably a revenge murder on a cheating wife or something along those lines. He stabs her, and then exits the bathroom immediately (or he waits for his possible accomplice #1 to text him that the coast is clear (both the waiter being absent and the exit [which he’s clearly watching closely] is clear and accessible)
T=0:06 > 0:08
■ after ensuring the coast is clear, the murder casually but swiftly leaves the bathroom and heads for the exit, after reaching it he doesn’t even bother to close the door. he bolts as far as possible from the scene.
T= 0:08> 0:10
■ the waiter returns from the kitchen with the killers drink. however they are no longer on site, and so he stands there holding the beverage cup with a look of confusion on his face, in the middle of the room (the best point from which to survey the diner for the now missing man/woman)
If the killer has to be one of the numbered suspects present in the diner, than it is most likely #1 by general process of elimination. however I feel that this is too simple to be true, and much prefer my own personal theory 🙂
***
Would you grudge giving him an applause?
It’s interesting to see how many have got it for (rather, against) #3! Bl##dy misogynists:-) Or, she’s truly evil?
(To be concluded )
End
June 13, 2019 6 Comments
Well, that’s the puzzle.
Enjoy reading these responses elicited, solution can wait! Of course don’t overlook the possibility of it figuring right there somewhere in them.
(sic)
*
Why R…. It’s 3 – Murder in a Ladies’ WC. The person No.3 is also a lady who will have easy access to a Ladies’ WC
Muhammad A….But sir… the murderer left his knife near the dead body….
The lady have the knife on her table.
Prabhu R…..Muhammad A…., murder will bring her own knife not borrow it from hotel
Wayne C…….Prabhu R….., not a hotel to borrow the knife from…it’s a restaurant…
*
Adarsh S….WHO: #3 b-coz there is only one ladies and 3 zents and murder place is ladies toilet. WHY: Bcoz she has no mony to pay
Erick M…….3-because she is looking suspicious
Sandeep K….3 because she is not eating anything and she is looking afraid
Shireen R……….2 is d(the) ans cos’ she was sitting with him
Tobenna N…….the waiter
Santosh T….3 her plate is shaking and bag is wide open
Sameena S……1 is the answer b’coz he is not having anything in the table
Malayandi P ….Answer is no 2. because there is two plates and a glass is there in front of that men
Mohan G….Suside
John S……1 no knife or food.
*
More responses, analysis and solution to follow:-)
End
June 6, 2019 8 Comments
You owe yourself:
(don’t forget your coffee)
The Good
**
The Bad
**
The Ugly
Adam is given 52 cards from his friend, and he knows in that pile are 13 cards that are facing up and the rest are facing down in a random order. Adam is blindfolded and cannot see the cards. He needs to create two piles with the same number of cards facing up.
How can he do it? Not a trick question.
This one is a nasty…don’t be too harsh on yourself.
**
Answers in the Comments as always.
End
Source: facebook.com/Elec.Eng.World, braingle.com (Xpert007 and Crazycriely) and Brightside.com
Recent Comments